Jung Art Therapy Theory

December 28, 2009 - 9:51 am Comments Off

Carl Jung, known for the Jung art therapy idea, was one of the associates of the famous Austrian psychiatrist, Sigmund Freud, the founding father of the psychoanalytic college of psychology. Freud became internationally recognized with his revolutionary theories about the conscious vs. Comatose parts of the mind. At the same time beginning his Jung art therapy hypotheses, Jung felt that although Freud made the objective of his care the comatose conscious, he felt that it was made to sound as though it were an unpalatable “cauldron of seething desires.” But according to the northern US Art Treatment organisation, Inc, Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud together, with lots of other psychiatric people at the time, had a massive hand in the development of art treatment.

It was accepted that these historic practitioners had the same discernment that entered into the development of art care, with its application of conflict resolution. The healing and learning that sprung from the “talk therapy” these men finally became famous for, was thought to have constructed a base for exposing the comatose levels of the mind. But many feel that it was essentially the Jung art therapy that appeared to be the method on which today’s art treatment received its roots. One of the tools Carl Jung used for his patients to express their comatose feelings was art, bringing forth the Jung art therapy method. Influenced by both psychology and therapy, Jung’s influence was primarily based on his attention to the mental advocating that was inside each art piece. Freud himself never had his patients do their own design, but Carl Jung electrified it. “To paint what we see before us, “Jung wrote, “is a different art from painting what we see within.” Absolutely rejecting Freud’s ideas, Jung expanded the province of therapy on a private level.

The Jung art therapy included design of all levels, the interaction of mythology and its influence on the current time, and the thoughts of local people including the round non secular mandala and the Sanskrit. Many felt he had commoner sense than Freud, as the he felt the person’s psyche had more than one interacting systems. One of these was the ego, as he discharged Freud’s superego and id, feeling the ego alone was considered to be a personal comatose state of the mind but as a basic collective comatose one. With much more of a upbeat view of art than did Freud, with his Jung art therapy points of view Carl Jung felt that mental art originated in the psyche and was thought to be intelligible to the general mass. But even more, he found out that another style called idealist art, dew on the collective comatose and was far deeper and with less individual nature. This kind of art were of images–appearing in dreams and in the art form–and were more spontaneoius and were thought to be more gratifying photos. He considered them as metaphors that held the unsettled individual’s separate worlds together in a complete world of stress and chaos.

Other articles you might like;

Comments are closed.